Legal Opinion

Carlock v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1913No. 6990PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. Harry C. Riddle, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

Plaintiff in error commenced an action against defendant in error to recover damages for a personal injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the -defendant, or negligence for which it was responsible. The complaint was in two counts. The first count, so far as material to consider, charged that plaintiff was employed by defendant as head-brakeman, and that in the discharge of his duties he was assisting in making up a train; that in making it up part of the cars were placed on the main track, about 75 feet from its intersection with a siding, at which point there was an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Colorado Mortgage & Investment Co. v. ReesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Travelers' Insurance v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  3. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  4. Stoneman v. Atlantic & Pacific R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. Lange v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Graven v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Hines v. SweeneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Lewis v. La NierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Willson v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  5. Denver Tramway Corp. v. GentrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API