Carlock v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. Harry C. Riddle, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
Plaintiff in error commenced an action against defendant in error to recover damages for a personal injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the -defendant, or negligence for which it was responsible. The complaint was in two counts. The first count, so far as material to consider, charged that plaintiff was employed by defendant as head-brakeman, and that in the discharge of his duties he was assisting in making up a train; that in making it up part of the cars were placed on the main track, about 75 feet from its intersection with a siding, at which point there was an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Colorado Mortgage & Investment Co. v. ReesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Travelers' Insurance v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
- Stoneman v. Atlantic & Pacific R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Lange v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Graven v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Hines v. SweeneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Lewis v. La NierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Willson v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Denver Tramway Corp. v. GentrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.