City of Fort Myers v. Heitman
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.
An application is made for an interlocutory writ of certiorari under Supreme Court Rule 34 to review two orders in an equity suit denying a motion to strike paragraph XIII of an amendment to the third amended bill of complaint and a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint for want of equity. It is sought to enjoin the collection of municipal taxes assessed upon stated real estate in the city for the years 1936, 1937 and 1938, upon the contention that the assessments for 1936 and 1937 are void because made in the name of “H. E. Heitman Est.”; and to enjoin such taxes for 1938 upon the ground…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ranger Realty Co. v. HeftySupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- L. N. R. R. Co. v. AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Coombes v. City of Coral GablesSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- The Arundel Corp. v. SproulSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Hackney v. McKennySupreme Court of Florida · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Collins Investment Co. v. Metropolitan Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Robertson v. GessnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Thompson v. City of Key WestSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Tompkins Land Corporation Ferndale Groves v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1944