Legal Opinion

De Gellert v. Poole

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 23, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from trial term. In this action by Theodora de Gellert against John F. Poole and others, on a contract for plaintiff’s services as star of the ballet, plaintiff had a verdict and judgment, and defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

The defendants, who are theatrical managers, by contract dated May 5, 1884, employed the plaintiff as an artist, in the character of the star of the ballet, during the run of the “Seven Havens.” Services under the contract were to commence August 18,1884, and were to be continued during the run of the play, unless sooner terminated by the notice hereinafter mentioned. The salary was to be $125 per week, when the services were rendered in the city of New York, and $150 when rendered outside of the city, together-with railroad fares and transportation of her baggage. The action is for services…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wachtel v. Noah Widows & Orphans' Benevolent SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Vatable v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bassett Lumber Co. v. Hunter-Benn Co. CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API