Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Tudor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Berrien. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Tudor got judgment against plaintiffs in error before a justice on a promissory note, and as both sides claim, obtained a transcript and caused judgment. *264to be entered on it in the circuit court. Subsequently tbe plaintiffs in error made a motion in that court to vacate the judgment on the ground that there were jurisdictional errors in the proceedings before the justice, and the court denied the motion. They thereupon brought this writ of error to review that decision. The judgment entered on the transcript is not returned, and since the entry of judgment in that way, as ordered by the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deguzman v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Wedel v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Gage v. JenkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API