Legal Opinion

State v. Frazier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 2002No. C8-00-2230PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.

William Allen Frazier pleaded guilty to one count of a controlled substance crime committed for the benefit’ of a gang. Despite his plea, Frazier asked the district court to sentence him without regard to the crime committed for the benefit of a gang statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.229 (2000). He argued that the statute, as applied, denies equal protection and due process under the federal and state constitutions. In support of his argument, Frazier presented data which he asserted indicated that section 609.229 has a disparate impact on the basis of race. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mayor of Philadelphia v. Educational Equality LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State v. BehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State v. DeShaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API