Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Lark

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided July 13, 1973No. 71 C 114(3)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

365 F.Supp. 289 (1973)

Harold Count JOHNSON, and all other plaintiffs, as per list, namely Russell Peden, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Al LARK, Individually and as Warden of the St. Louis City Jail, et al., Defendants.

No. 71 C 114(3).

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

July 13, 1973.

Phillip F. Fishman and Walter Heiser, Legal Aid Society, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Jack L. Koehr, City Counselor and John J. FitzGibbon, Associate City Counselor, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants Al Lark and City of St. Louis.

Richard O. Funsch, Carter, Bull, Baer, Presberg & Lee, St. Louis, Mo., for Dr.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. William Oscar Hampton v. Holmesburg Prison Officials. Appeal of Richard BurkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Owens v. HaasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Rhem v. MalcolmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Johnson-El v. SchoemehlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. Leo F. Feeley, IV v. George Sampson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API