Searing v. Cohen
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrank, J.
The plaintiffs, who are the landlords of premises 2741 Sedgwick Avenue, are seeking to recover the sum of $225 from the defendant, who is one of their tenants. These plaintiffs claim that they were compelled to expend this sum of money for legal services incurred in commencing nine separate nonpayment summary proceedings against the defendant because of Ms failure to pay Ms rent.
That there has been ill-feeling, difficulty and acrimonious dispute between the parties is quite evident. This court is not unmindful of the plaintiffs’ contention that they were compelled to institute nine separate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Moers v. . MoersNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Goebel v. . IfflaNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- 130 West 57 Corp. v. HymanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946
- Slater v. Von ChorusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fleet v. Rhode (In Re Fleet)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990