Morris v. Freudenheim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and second amended complaint and cross claims against defendant Robert L. Freudenheim dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of Robert L. Freudenheim (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint and cross claims against him. “An out-of-possession owner who has relinquished control over the premises will not be held liable for subsequent injuries resulting from dangerous conditions on the premises” (Gomez v Walton Realty Assocs., 258 AD2d 307, 308; see, Bittrolff v Ho’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tajan v. Pavia & HarcourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Bittrolff v. Ho's Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Mazurick v. ChalosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Croman v. County of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Landau v. Beach Haven Shopping Center, L. L. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Powers v. City of GenevaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Kaplan v. Menlo Realty Income Props. 28, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023