Legal Opinion

Morris v. Freudenheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and second amended complaint and cross claims against defendant Robert L. Freudenheim dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of Robert L. Freudenheim (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint and cross claims against him. “An out-of-possession owner who has relinquished control over the premises will not be held liable for subsequent injuries resulting from dangerous conditions on the premises” (Gomez v Walton Realty Assocs., 258 AD2d 307, 308; see, Bittrolff v Ho’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tajan v. Pavia & HarcourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Bittrolff v. Ho's Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Mazurick v. ChalosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Croman v. County of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Landau v. Beach Haven Shopping Center, L. L. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Powers v. City of GenevaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Kaplan v. Menlo Realty Income Props. 28, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API