Legal Opinion

Porto Rico Fertilizer Co. v. Sancho

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 13, 1938No. Nos. 3274, 3285PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BINGHAM, Circuit Judge.

These are two appeals from judgments of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico involving similar questions of law under the Insular Income Tax Act approved August 6,1925, No. 74. The facts are to be gathered from the complaints to which demurrers were filed, on the ground that they did not state a cause of action.

By the statute the taxpayer was required to file a return (sections 37(a), 39(a) (b), and 27(a) and to pay the tax (section 53(a) (b) computed by the Treasurer upon the face of the return (section 54) without formal assessment.

In the complaint of the Fertilizer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Domenech v. United Porto Rican Sugar Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bonet v. Yabucoa Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Sancho v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  3. Porto Rico Telephone Co. v. DescartesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957
  4. Porto Rico Telephone Co. v. DescartesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API