Legal Opinion

Raines v. . Osborne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from Bryson, J., at September Term, 1922, of Pole.

1Opinion of the CourtWalices, J.

Tbis is tbe appeal of tbe plaintiffs, J. 0. Eaines, Will Eaines, Theodore Eaines, E. C. Garrett, and E. E. Garrett, or of tbe plaintiffs other than EL Ewart Constant, from tbe judgment against them in tbe court below.

In tbe defendant’s appeal we settled tbe meaning of tbe two items, Nos. 11 and 12, in tbe will of Mrs. Eichs, with reference to what was meant by tbe words “To any servant, or any other household employee,” construing those words as if they read “To any household servant or any other household employee,” and thus considered, it is our opinion that none of the present appellants…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Francks v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Freeman v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Frazer v. WeldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Murphy v. LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Bunting v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API