Yarborough v. City of Warren
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, residents of the City of Warren, Michigan, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (hereinafter the NAÁCP) and others have brought two civil rights actions arising out of the elimination of an urban renewal program in Warren. First, plaintiffs allege that the municipal defendants (the City, the Mayor and three City Council members) violated their rights under the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1982 and 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. (the Fair…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Louisiana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Palmer v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jackson v. JiminoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- Rivera v. Incorporated Village of FarmingdaleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Silva v. East Providence Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975
- Rudisill v. FlynnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Clients' Council v. PierceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.