Legal Opinion

Capital Newspapers Division of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the case remitted to that court for entry of a judgment declaring that it was error for the trial court not to have conducted a preliminary inquiry before deciding to exclude petitioner’s reporter from the hearing.

In midtrial of a criminal action the trial court granted the defendant’s application for a separate hearing under People v Sandoval (34 NY2d 371) out of the presence of the jury to determine which, if any, of the defendant’s prior criminal acts would be admissible to impeach…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Westchester Rockland Newspapers, Inc. v. LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MATTER OF CAPITAL NEWSPAPERS DIV. OF THE HEARST CORP. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API