Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dahlgren v. First National Bank of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1978No. 9146Published

1DissentMowbray, J.

with whom Gunderson, J., joins:

Respectfully, I dissent.

In order to qualify as a will, any document so offered must be shown to have been executed with the intent to make a will, or what we term in the law, anumus testandi. The Supreme Court of California has described the requirement as follows:

In order for a document to be the last will and testament of a deceased person, it must, in addition to meeting all the legal requirements, [1] clearly show that the decedent intended it to take effect only after his death, and it must [2] satisfactorily appear therefrom that the decedent intended by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re Estate of SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Estate of ButtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Matter of Estate of WebberIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re Augestad's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API