Legal Opinion

Carl Gutmann & Co. v. Rohrer Knitting Mills, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 1949No. Civil Action No. 8620PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed its statement of claim for breach of contract with copy of a written contract attached thereto as an exhibit. Defendants have filed their motion to dismise alleging, inter alia, that the four alleged causes of action are stated in a manner so prolix, repetitious and replete with immaterial, impertinent, redundant and evidential matters and conclusions of law as to constitute a gross violation of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and, as so set forth, are impossible to answer in a clear and adequate manner; furthermore, as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schuckman v. RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. Wells v. Universal Pictures Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ward v. Deavers Young v. WardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  2. Cass v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. C. H. Little & Co. v. Gay Apparel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  4. Benner v. Philadelphia Musical SocietyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Carrier Corp. v. Sims Motor Transport Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API