Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Coleman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
The above-named plaintiffs brought this action on June 17,1976, against the defendants, * on behalf of the class of all mobile disabled and elderly persons who are denied ready access to, and effective use of, federally financed mass transportation by reason of the physical and structural barriers in the design of public transit equipment.
Plaintiffs’ (hereinafter “Disabled”) claims are based upon the Urban Mass Transportation Act (“UMTA”), 49 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.; the Federal Aid Highway Acts, 23 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972