Legal Opinion
Steel Const. Co. v. Louisiana Highway Commission
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 21, 1945No. 82PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BORAH, District Judge.
Findings of Fact
I. There exists in this case a diversity of citizenship and the amount involved far exceeds the jurisdictional amount.
2. The Steel Construction Company did not follow the administrative procedure outlined in subsections 1, 7 and 8 of Section 5, Division 1 of the contract, to correct the abuses alleged to exist in this case, but in most instances acquiesced in the requirements of the inspectors and/or resident engineer.
3. The Steel Construction Company only made general complaints and these were in most instances made after the work involved in the dispute…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- J.T.P. Development Corp. v. Majestic Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
- Federal Savings & Loan Ins. Corporation v. SzarabajkaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
- Gulotta v. SwinneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- C. Graham Pembroke, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross v. Gulf Oil Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Jerrie Ice Company v. Col-Flake CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.