Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Lamberton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1917No. Docket No. 119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Cass; Des Voignes, J. Case by William H. Matthews against Frank B. Lamberton for an assault and battery. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

(after stating the facts). The first assignment argued by counsel for defendant is the fourth. The following question was asked:

*750“Q. Doctor, in the treatment which you were required to give to Mr. Matthews on the occasion when you treated him, was it necessary that you make any investigation as to whether or not the patient had a hernia?”

This was objected to as incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial. After argument the question was allowed, and was answered as follows:

“A. I made such an examination.as far as I thought advisable or necessary; there were no indications that called for any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maynard v. VintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Jones v. President of PortlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Mayo v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Foster v. KrauseMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Konieczka v. Mt. Clemens Metal Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Henderson v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API