Friedlander v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Affirmed. Appellant waived his right to appeal upon entering his plea to thirteen counts charging a scheme to defraud. There was no reservation of a right to appeal. We also note that appellant has never sought to withdraw his plea and permit the state to reinstate the one hundred charges dropped contemporaneously with his entering the plea. Additionally, appellant’s claims of lack of jurisdiction are without merit. Cf. Hoover v. State, 530 So.2d 308 (Fla.1988); Maralit v. State, 468 So.2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Livolsi v. State, 451 So.2d 542 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). In any event, our…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Livolsi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Maralit v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985