Legal Opinion

Pokriefka v. Mazur

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1967No. Calendar 1, Docket 51,538, 51,539Published

1Opinion of the Court

379 Mich. 348 (1967)

151 N.W.2d 806

POKRIEFKA

v.

MAZUR.

Calendar No. 1, Docket Nos. 51,538, 51,539.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided July 21, 1967.

Markle & Markle, for plaintiff.

Davidson, Gotshall, Kelly, Halsey & Kohl (John R. Secrest, of counsel), for defendant.

Amici Curiae: Marcus, McCroskey, Libner, Reamon, Williams & Dilley, for reversal.

Luyendyk, Hainer & Karr (Stephen W. Karr and G. Anthony Edens, of counsel), for affirmance.

KELLY, J.

The facts and issues involved herein are so well and concisely stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, 3 Mich App 534-536, that we quote that opinion in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hunter v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Smith v. Lawrence Baking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ehrsam v. BorgenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API