Legal Opinion

State v. Clement

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 7, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Weintraub, C. J.

The question is whether a defendant should be permitted pretrial inspection of his grand jury testimony. Almasi and Ziemba appeared before the grand jury under subpoena. Almasi testified for five to six hours, and Ziemba for about two and three-quarter hours. The testimony of each related to transactions which are the subject matter of the indictments returned against him. On the motions for inspection, each asserted his recollection of his testimony is not complete or precise, and his counsel certified he cannot prepare for trial with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SMITHNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Doe v. KleinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. State v. CPS Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. State v. FISHERNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  5. In Re 15th Essex County Grand JuryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API