Legal Opinion
(PC) Bland v. Rodriguez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 5, 2022No. 1:20-cv-00478Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOSHUA BLAND, Case No. 1:20-cv-00478-DAD-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 11 MOTION TO COMPEL v. 12 (ECF. No. 78) ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Joshua Bland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 19 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On December 3, 2021, Defendants filed a motion to compel, arguing that Plaintiff failed 21 to respond to defendant Rodriguez’s first set of interrogatories and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Juan Manuel Morales v. City of San Rafael and Daniel HulettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.