Legal Opinion
State v. Dayton
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 5, 1968No. 68-79PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES CARROLL, Chief Judge.
The appellee James C. Dayton, who was an employee of the tax assessor of Metropolitan Dade County, and the appellee George Vizenthal were informed against, charged with certain counts of grand larceny and with conspiring to commit grand larceny. Dayton pleaded not guilty and moved to quash the information, claiming immunity as a result of having testified before a grand jury on related matters.1 His motion was granted. The trial court also granted a motion of the defendant Vizenthal to quash the conspiracy count for insufficiency. The state appealed, as authorized…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Scarlett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- United States v. StrombergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Pinkerton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BarnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- State v. ChadroffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Cappetta v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- State v. LevineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.