Legal Opinion

Sprague & Rhodes Commodity Corp. v. M/V Procer Fulgencio Yegros

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 17, 1985No. 83 Civ. 5619 (CES)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

STEWART, District Judge:

Plaintiff Sprague & Rhodes Commodity Corporation (“Sprague & Rhodes”) brings this action against defendants Fulmar Paraguaya Line (“Fulmar Line”), Fulmar Paraguaya, S.A. (“Fulmar, S.A.”) and Consultora Fulmar Paraguaya S.R.L. (“Fulmar S.R. L.”) for short delivery of a shipment of coffee. Following defendant Fulmar S.A.’s failure to respond to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, we entered a default judgment in favor of plaintiff. Fulmar S.A. moves to set aside the default judgment and now answers the summary judgment motion. Although we exercise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. American International Group, Inc. v. London American International Corporation Limited and Midland Bank LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. Crystal v. The Cunard Steam-Ship Co. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Philipp Bros. Metal Corp. v. S.S. "Rio Iguazu"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API