Sprague & Rhodes Commodity Corp. v. M/V Procer Fulgencio Yegros
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
STEWART, District Judge:
Plaintiff Sprague & Rhodes Commodity Corporation (“Sprague & Rhodes”) brings this action against defendants Fulmar Paraguaya Line (“Fulmar Line”), Fulmar Paraguaya, S.A. (“Fulmar, S.A.”) and Consultora Fulmar Paraguaya S.R.L. (“Fulmar S.R. L.”) for short delivery of a shipment of coffee. Following defendant Fulmar S.A.’s failure to respond to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, we entered a default judgment in favor of plaintiff. Fulmar S.A. moves to set aside the default judgment and now answers the summary judgment motion. Although we exercise…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- American International Group, Inc. v. London American International Corporation Limited and Midland Bank LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Crystal v. The Cunard Steam-Ship Co. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Philipp Bros. Metal Corp. v. S.S. "Rio Iguazu"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981