Legal Opinion
People v. Fowler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 12, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant contends that certain statements he made to law enforcement officials should have been suppressed. However, the specific arguments asserted by the defendant on appeal to support this contention are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Vasquez, 66 NY2d 968, 970 [1985], cert denied 475 US 1109 [1986]; People v Maxis, 50 AD3d 922, *899923 [2008]; People v Rogers, 34 AD3d 504, 505 [2006]). Moreover, the defendant may not rely upon trial testimony to challenge a suppression ruling where, as here, he failed to request a reopening of the suppression hearing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. AbrewNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. PetronioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. OjarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. HeronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. OrmejusteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. GiddensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. OrmejusteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014