Legal Opinion

Home Loan Ass'n v. Wilkins

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application by J. L. King to set aside an order of sale made by the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco on a foreclosure of mortgage. A judgment had been rendered against one Wilkins for the sale of certain premises mortgaged by him, and for payment of any deficiency arising upon the sale.

Read the full summary

Application by J. L. King to set aside an order of sale made by the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco on a foreclosure of mortgage. A judgment had been rendered against one Wilkins for the sale of certain premises mortgaged by him, and for payment of any deficiency arising upon the sale. King was a purchaser from Wilkins and a defendant in the foreclosure suit, and was in possession of the property at the date of the decree, and his appeal therefrom to the Supreme Oourt. On appeal, he filed an undertaking in the sum of three hundred dollars as rec1uired by section 941 of…

1Per curiam

On the former hearing in Department Two, (11 Pac. C. L. J. 252), it was held, that where an appeal is taken from a judgment for the sale of mortgaged premises, by one not in possession thereof; the sale might be stayed without filing an undertaking for the payment of a deficiency arising upon such sale; and that the petitioner, not being `in possession of the mortgaged premises, was entitled to have such sale stayed without filing such undertaking. It now transpires that the petitioner was in possession of such premises, and as lie has not filed an undertaking for the payment of the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spence v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API