Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Meink

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 29, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-3892Published

1Opinion of the Court

]UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES M. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-03892 (TNM) TROY E. MEINK, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Days after another judge in this district granted summary judgment against Dr. James Murphy, he filed this lawsuit raising similar claims. Murphy is upset that U.S. Air Force officials disclosed derogatory information from his past as an Air Force physician to his new employer, causing him to lose his job. The first judge found his claim untenable. Now, Murphy adds two new defendants and re-works his allegations. But his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Richardson, Roy Dale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  5. Richard Drake v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API