Legal Opinion

Ex parte Bakley

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 29, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

WADDIUR, District Judge.

This is a petition of Zebedee F. Bakley and Bertha Bakley, his wife, for a writ of habeas corpus, setting forth that their son, Alfred F. Bakley, a bo}r of the age of 17 years, enlisted in the United States navy without the consent of his parents or guardians, and is now unlawfully restrained of his liberty by Albert C. Dil-lingham, Commander United States Navy, on the United States receiving ship Franklin, lying in the waters of the Elizabeth river, in the Eastern district of Virginia, and praying for his discharge from such custody. The petition is duly sworn to by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Henderson v. Mayor of the City of New York Commissioners of Immigration v. North German LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. In Re MorrisseySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Joseph v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. United States v. ReavesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex parte DunakinDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1913
  2. Dillingham v. BakleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1907
  3. Ex parte AveryDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API