United States v. Mannie Goldberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.
The principal issue here is the sufficiency of the Government’s evidence under the rule, applicable in prosecutions for perjury, “that one witness, without corroborating circumstances, does not suffice,” 7 Wigmore, Evidence (3d ed. 1940), p. 273; Weiler v. United States, 1945, 323 U.S. 606, 608, 65 S.Ct. 548, 89 L.Ed. 495. Sufficient apart from this, it plainly was.
Goldberg was convicted on Counts I, II and IV of an indictment charging perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1621, Count III having been dismissed by the Court. He was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- United States v. RemingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- James Arena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Irving B. Kahn and Teleprompter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Louis A. Marchisio, John H. Seiter and W. Ward WhippleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Paul R. Jones and Leo B. MittelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Murray Bernard WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- State v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.