Legal Opinion

Raper v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 5, 1960No. 38219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

We have one question to be determined and that is whether or not the Judge of the Superior Court of Cobb County on appeal erred in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. It is an elementary principle of law in wills and administration of estates that an executor or administrator must observe the priorities prescribed by law for the payment of the deceased’s debts. In King v. Johnson, 96 Ga. 497, 498 (23 S. E. 500), this court held: “When a widow is the administratrix upon the estate of her deceased husband, she is bound, while acting in that capacity, to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. CoferSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Hall v. FIRST NATL. BANK OF ATLANTACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. King v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Churchill v. Bee & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Marks v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hines v. WingoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Raper v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Raper v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API