Legal Opinion

Horne v. Guiser Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Practice in Supreme Court. Evidence. Damages. Trover. Yerdict. Before Judge Simmons. Crawford Superior Court. September Term, 1884. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

In- this action for the recovery of personal property, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for one hundred and forty-five dollars, as the value of the property sued for, with fifty dollars hire therefor. The defendant had purchased the machine in question, and had agreed that the plaintiff should retain the title thereto until it was paid for. He gave three promissory notes for $83.33 each, due respectively 1st November, 1882,1st July, 1883, and 1st November, 1883. After two of these notes were due, and a short time before the last would have fallen due, this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tuller v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  2. Clark v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  3. Bond v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  4. Oakley Mills Manufacturing Co. v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Securities Trust Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Bell v. G. Ober & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Wilson v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Kite Consolidated School District v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Lawyers' Surety Co. v. ReinachCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API