Legal Opinion
White v. E. L. Bruce Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 11, 1946No. Civil Action No. 406PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
This suit for declaratory judgment puts in issue questions of validity and infringement of defendant’s three patents, Partee & Gray 2,288,585, Partee & Gray 2,341,161, and Partee 2,276,253. Infringement of claims 1, 2 and 5 of ’585 and claims 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7 of T61 are at issue. Claims 3 and 4 of ’253 are in issue on validity, but the charge of infringement as to ’253 has been withdrawn. ’161 describes a finishing line. Raw oak, for example, is placed on a conveyor belt and is a finished hardwood floor strip when it leaves the production line twelve minutes later.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. CarySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Blake v. San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Floridin Co. v. Attapulgus Clay Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pennsylvania Crusher Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951