Legal Opinion

Dahlinger v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 28, 1931No. 4558PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

This ease comes up upon petition for review of an order and decision of the Board of Tax Appeals sustaining the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in his construction of section 206 (a) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 232), and section 208 (a) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1924 (26 USCA § 939 note), as applied to a salé by the petitioner of certain stock under a contract made in 1920.

In January, 1920, the petitioner and other stockholders of the Columbia Plate Glass Company entered into an agreement with Erazier & Co., brokers, for the sale of their stock,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Micks v. StevensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. Stanton v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. Eavenson v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  4. Consolidated Utilities Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  5. Fairman v. League of Women Voters of United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API