Sommers v. Deran
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By CARPENTER, J.
This action in the trial court was one for a judgment for money based on a negotiable bank check given by defendant to plaintiff on which payment was refused by the bank for the reason defendant had no funds in the bank.
The- answer contains three defenses: First, a general denial of all the allegations of the petition; second, that plaintiff has ass'gned her rights in her cause of action to another and new has no interest in tho subject-matter of the action; and, third, in effect, the execution of the check described in the petition is admitted by defendant, but he says…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Gray v. State Ex Rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Hall v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- State v. RickmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Finley v. PlessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Gray v. State Ex Rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.