Legal Opinion
Eisenberg v. Houck (In Re Houck)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 19, 1995No. 17-12706PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JUDITH K. FITZGERALD, Bankruptcy Judge.
The matter before the court is the trustee’s complaint for turnover against Debtor. The parties have submitted the matter on the pleadings and briefs. 1 There are no material facts in dispute. The trustee seeks to recover Debtor’s interest in an Individual Retirement Account (IRA). 2 Debtor contends that under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Patterson v. Shumate, 504 U.S. 753, 112 S.Ct. 2242, 119 L.Ed.2d 519 (1992), and pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 541(c)(2), the IRA is excluded from property of his bankruptcy estate. We find…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kosta P. Velis, Debtor-Appellant v. Mary Kardanis, Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- In Re HallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
- Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. v. Robert ColvilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Posner v. SheridanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gilchinsky v. NATIONAL WESTMINISTER BANKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Cisneros v. Kim (In Re Kim)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Grund v. Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Pineo v. Fulton (In Re Fulton)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,261, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2639, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23931l in Re Peter D. Barshak, Debtor. In Re Christine Shubert, Esquire, Duly Qualified and Acting Chapter 7 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.