Streitfeld v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice.
This is an appeal from a sentence by the Superior Court after a jury had found defendant guilty of “knowingly or recklessly” selling obscene material in violation of 11 Del.C. § 1361(1). 1 Defendant contends that the Trial Court erroneously instructed the jury on the meaning of the word, “prurient”, and that he was prejudiced by a coercive supplementary jury instruction. We discuss these contentions seriatim.
I
The first issue for consideration concerns the instruction on the meaning of “prurient.” The Trial Judge directed the jury, as follows:
“I turn now to the statute which has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
3Cited by10 opinions
- Desmond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Rush v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Boatson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.