Legal Opinion

Streitfeld v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 21, 1977PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a sentence by the Superior Court after a jury had found defendant guilty of “knowingly or recklessly” selling obscene material in violation of 11 Del.C. § 1361(1). 1 Defendant contends that the Trial Court erroneously instructed the jury on the meaning of the word, “prurient”, and that he was prejudiced by a coercive supplementary jury instruction. We discuss these contentions seriatim.

I

The first issue for consideration concerns the instruction on the meaning of “prurient.” The Trial Judge directed the jury, as follows:

“I turn now to the statute which has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Desmond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. Rush v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Boatson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  5. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API