Ricard v. Ricard
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. Wm. Hutchinson, Judge. This is an action in equity to annul the marriage of the plaintiff with the defendant on the ground that at the time thereof the defendant had a husband living. This is an appeal from an order granting the defendant temporary suit money and alimony.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.
The plaintiff alleged in his petition that, at the time of his marriage to the defendant, she had a husband living, known as Count Predosa, and that the plaintiff was unaware of said fact, and prayed 'an annulment of his marriage to the defendant. The defendant filed a motion for temporary alimony, in which she denied having ' a living husband at .the time of her marriage to the plaintiff; and, upon a hearing of said motion at the September term of the district court, the application for alimony was denied. Thereafter, and at a subsequent term of the court, the defendant filed a motion asking…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Griffin v. . GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Hite v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Higgins v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Kimble v. KimbleWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Willits v. WillitsNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Wooten v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Pickard v. PickardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Hanford v. HanfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Davis v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Meredith v. ShakespeareWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.