Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Electro-Static Finishing, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1975No. 44771PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, Justice.

Employee-relator seeks review of a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Commission denying her compensation on the basis that she did not sustain a personal injury which aggravated a preexisting condition. The commission found that employee “suffered a manifestation of continuing symptoms” of an injury occurring 4 years earlier in an automobile accident completely unrelated to her employment. We reverse.

In May of 1968, employee was involved in an automobile accident which resulted in loss of work for 1 week. She was able to return to her employment, but was forced to leave in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Forseen v. Tire Retread CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Larson v. Davidson-Boutell Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Metro Contract Services, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Spilman v. Morey Fish Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Newcomb v. Richfield Yards, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Meyers v. Electro-Static Finishing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Spilman v. Morey Fish Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API