Craven v. Jackson County
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.
We are asked to decide whether Respondent Samad’s proposed winery and related retail activity are lawful conditional uses in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone under ORS 215.283(2)(a). 1 The question is whether the proposed uses are “commercial activities that are in conjunction with farm use.”
Samad proposes to build a winery and retail tasting room in conjunction with a vineyard being planted on his land. Petitioner Craven, an adjacent land owner, wants the land to remain exclusively in agricultural use. Over Craven’s objections, Respondent Jackson County (County) granted Samad a conditional…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Craven v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Utah Local Government Trust v. Wheeler MacHinery Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
- King Estate Winery, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Warburton v. Harney CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Stop the Dump Coal. v. Yamhill Cnty.Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.