Legal Opinion
California v. Harvier
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1983No. 80-5323PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
California brought this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (Supp.IV 1980) for a declaratory judgment against the chairman and certain members of the Quechan Tribal Council, and the fish and game warden for the Quechan Tribe of Indians. The state sought a declaration that it was empowered, under “federal Indian law,” to apply and enforce its fish and game laws against non-Indians hunting and fishing on the Quechan reservation. California alleged that the tribal officials had threatened the state’s game wardens and were denying them access to the reservation (Fort Yuma).
In a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- John Marshall v. Grant Sawyer, as Governor of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- The Quechan Tribe of Indians v. Raymond Rowe, Sheriff of Imperial CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Donald L. Snell v. Cleveland, Inc., and Patricia Faber John Does Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jose S. Chacon v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Board of RegentsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Lundgren v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Petaluma City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.