Legal Opinion

Cusic v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 1987No. 87-2362PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

512 So.2d 309 (1987)

Greg Edward CUSIC, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-2362.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 11, 1987.

2Per curiam

Greg Edward Cusic sought post-conviction relief in the trial court. Cusic contended that he was sentenced illegally because the trial judge departed from the recommended guidelines sentence for the reason that Cusic was an habitual offender. He claims the benefit of Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986), which held that the habitual offender statute is not an exemption to the sentencing guidelines and does not furnish a basis…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. McCuiston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Cravey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rowe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Cusic v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Gilmore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API