MATTER OF ROISTACHER v. McCoy
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtG-abbielli, J.
Petitioners, successful at Special Term upon a Referee’s finding that they should be classified Court Clerk III rather than Court Clerk II, were turned back in the Appellate Division where a unanimous court found that the classification of Court Clerk II assigned by respondent, Administrator of the State Judicial Conference, was not arbitrary or capricious. Petitioners’ contention here is that the standard of number of people supervised, assertedly used by respondent and approved by the Appellate Division, is nowhere made a criterion for classification in the Court Clerk III category.
The…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Gavigan v. McCoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity v. Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Anderson v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Clinton County Department of Public HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Hansen v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.