Legal Opinion
Seneca Insurance v. Lincolnshire Management, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 22, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered April 2, 1999, which granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 327 and 3211 (a) (4) to dismiss the complaint based on forum non conveniens and because there was another action pending between the same parties in the California state courts, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.
This action seeks a declaration that plaintiff Seneca is not obligated, by its business owner’s and commercial umbrella liability policies issued to defendants, to defend…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgenthau v. ErlbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Riviera Trading Corp. v. Oakley, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Wittich v. WittichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Fischer & Porter Co. v. Moorco International Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by9 opinions
- San Ysidro Corp. v. RobinowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. v. Honeywell International Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Continental Insurance v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Harleysville Insurance v. Ermar Painting & Contracting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.