Legal Opinion

Arrington v. Horner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1913No. 17,975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Kingman district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action in the district court was commenced by Arrington to recover the value of a horse which he owned and which was injured in a collision with an automobile driven by Horner. The jury returned special findings and a general verdict favorable to the defendant. Judgment was rendered accordingly and the plaintiff appeals.

James Harper was driving a team of mules hitched to a loaded wagon, eastward on a public highway. The horse which was injured was a saddle horse and was tied with two or two and one-half feet of rein to the back band of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. RoachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Hendren ex rel. Hendren v. SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Leinbach v. Pickwick Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Super v. Modell TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API