Legal Opinion

People v. Monroe

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1987No. 63723, 63724 consPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

Defendants Louis Monroe and Ellis Levin were charged in separate actions in the circuit court of Cook County with violations of the Drug Paraphernalia Control Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 56V2, pars. 2101 through 2107). Their cases were consolidated for trial, and on the defendants’ motions to dismiss, the court held that the Act was impermissibly vague and therefore unconstitutional. The State appeals directly to this court. 107 Ill. 2d R. 603.

The State raises five issues on appeal. However, because of our disposition of the case it is only necessary that we reach the following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hickey v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Shaw v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. PinkonslyIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. NielsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. 1515 North Wells, L.P. v. 1513 North Wells, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. People v. GentryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API