Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1958No. L.A. 24909Published

1Concurrence

CARTER, J., Concurring.

Although I agree with the conclusion reached in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Traynor, for the reasons hereinafter stated, I regret my inability to join in said opinion.

My views with respect to the application of article I, section 14, of the Constitution of California to the ordinary situation in which private property has been taken or damaged for a public use, have been stated many times in both majority, dissenting and concurring opinions which I have written as a member of this court (Rose v. State, 19 Cal.2d 713 [123 P.2d 505]; Bacich v. Board of Control, 23…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API