Hagood v. Aikin
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. Peyton F. Edwards. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
The question in this case is, was it error, in a suit brought upon promissory notes executed on the 1st of January, 1876, which provided for the payment of interest at the rate of two and one-half per cent, per month from their date until payment should be made, to enter judgment, since the adoption of the present constitution, for the principal and interest due upon such notes up to judgment, and to make the judgment bear interest from and after its date, upon such aggregate sum, at the same rate which the parties contracted the notes should bear.
At the time the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hutchins v. WadeTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Frazier v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1849
- Coles v. KelseyTexas Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by7 opinions
- Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word v. DunsmoorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Washington v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- David v. First Nat. Bank of ClaudeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- David v. First Nat. Bank of ClaudeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.