Legal Opinion

Combs v. Wilber

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order allowing an appeal from justice’s court. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

' Eelator recovered judgment in justice’s court on July 7, 1893, against Israel B. Sutton. July 12 —the last day for appeal — the defendant prepared a bond and affidavit, appended a justification taken before a notary public, and in the absence of the justice, who was out of the city, left the papers in the files of the case, which *236were found in the office of the justice. The fees had been previously paid by the defendant to the justice. The justice made a return to this appeal, but on motion the appeal was dismissed by the circuit court; and defendant thereupon made a motion for leave to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Draper v. TookerMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. Charles Amos & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Stanton v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Selby v. BradingMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Lent v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API