Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McEntire v. Estate of McEntire

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 19, 1979No. 79-17Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

Although I agree that summary judgment in favor of the bank was proper, I cannot agree that the estate of J. L. McEntire was entitled to a summary judgment in this case. Perhaps the basis for my disagreement is the majority’s treatment of the basic document upon which appellant relies as a signature card. It may be, even though it is not so labelled, but it is much more than that. It is an agreement between J. L. McEntire and his wife, Vera E., both of whom signed the document. The fact that it is an agreement between them is obvious from reading the second paragraph of the quotation in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. Ramsey v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Union & Mercantile Trust Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Park v. McClemensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Dickson v. Jonesboro Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API