Legal Opinion

Watson v. S.G.M., Ltd.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 12, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-2090-SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The parties agree on all the relevant facts for purposes of this motion; the only issue concerns which line of authority to follow in determining the citizenship of a limited partnership. If the citizenship of all partners, both limited and general, is to be considered, then diversity is lacking and the case must be dismissed. If the court considers only the general partner’s citizenship for purposes of diversity, subject matter jurisdiction…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. Mesa Operating Limited Partnership v. Louisiana Intrastate Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. Anchorage-Hynning & Co., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. Thomas G. MoringielloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  5. Trent Realty Associates v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API