Legal Opinion

Grzezinski v. Pruss

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1927No. 1874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This action was brought by Grzezinski and Edward H. Ray as plaintiffs, upon a note and mortgage executed and delivered by Joseph and Mary Pruss. The defendants each filed a separate cross petition in which it was set out that the execution and delivery of the note and mortgage was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation. We think that the allegations of the cross petitions are not sustained in the evidence and that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover and to have foreclosure of their mortgage.

It is undisputed that the mortgage was given tó cover court costs and pay for legal services…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herkins v. PerrinOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API